Supreme Court Docket


Index | October | November | December | January | February | March | April

April 2001


Monday, April 16, 2001


Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery, Attorney General of Ohio, et al.
No. 00-6374

Subject:
Appeals, Signature

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Melvin Tyler v. Burl Cain, Warden
No. 00-5961

Subject:
Jury Instructions, Reasonable Doubt

Question:

  1. Whether a second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus asserting a claim under Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 (1990) (per curiam), "relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court," within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2)(A) (Supp. IV 1998).

  2. Whether Cage v. Louisiana announced a new rule of constitutional law that should be made retroactive to cases on collateral review.
Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


New Hampshire v. Maine
No. 130, Orig.

Subject:
Res Judicata

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Tuesday, April 17, 2001


United States and Department of Agriculture v. United Foods, Inc.
No. 00-276

Subject:
First Amendment, Compelled Industry Advertising, Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act of 1990

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Alabama v. Michael Herman Bozeman
No. 00-492

Subject:
Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), Anti-Shuttling Provision

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Wednesday, April 18, 2001


Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. Don King, et al.
No. 00-549

Subject:
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), distinctiveness requirement

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. Celestine Garris, Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Garris, Deceased
No. 00-346

Subject:
Admiralty Law, Wrongful Death, Negligence

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Monday, April 23, 2001


Idaho v. United States, et al.
No. 00-189

Subject:
Property, American Indians, Reservations, Submerged Lands

Question:

    In United States v. Alaska, 521 U.S. 1 (1997), this Court held, in the context of a statehood act, that congressional ratification of an executive order reservation known to contain submerged lands may imply an affirmative intent to defeat state title to such submerged lands. The question presented here is whether a defeat of state title to submerged lands is implied when Congress, in a pre-statehood act, authorizes cession negotiations with an Indian tribe occupying an executive order reservation for the purchase of lands "not agricultural and valuable chiefly for minerals and timber," with the purpose of releasing submerged lands from the reservation.
Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Sharon B. Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Company
No. 00-763

Subject:
Sexual Harassment, Front Pay, Damages, Statutory Cap, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Tuesday, April 24, 2001


Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 00-1011

Subject:
Immigration, Deportation, Judicial Review, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act

Question:

    Whether the court of appeals correctly concluded that, under 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(C) (Supp. V 1999), it lacked jurisdiction on direct petitions for review over petitioners' non-constitutional challenges to their final removal orders, but that the district court had habeas corpus jurisdiction to entertain those challenges under 28 U.S.C. 2241.
Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr
No. 00-767

Subject:
Immigration, Deportation, Judicial Review, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act

Question:

  1. Whether the district court had habeas corpus jurisdiction over respondent's challenge to his final removal order.

  2. Whether the Board of Immigration Appeals properly concluded that respondent is not eligible for discretionary relief from deportation under former 8 U.S.C. 1182(c) (1994) because his removal proceeding was commenced after the repeal of Section 1182(c) became effective, even though he pleaded guilty and was convicted before that date.
Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Wednesday, April 25, 2001


Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al. v. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al.
No. 00-596

Altadis U.S.A. Inc., etc., et al. v. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al.
No. 00-597

Subject:

Question:
  1. Whether state regulations that restrict the advertising of tobacco products near a school or playground are preempted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act.

  2. Whether such regulations violate the First Amendment.
Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs:


Florida v. Robert A. Thomas
No. 00-391

Subject:
Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure, Automobiles

Question:

Decisions:

Resources:

Briefs: